Flapjack State

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask a question
  • Submit Flapjack

Pedestrian Crossing PSA

codeman38:

swankivy:

You know those buttons you have to push to cross at a crosswalk?

You should push them once.

Pushing the button on the ped pole once tells the signal system to change modes. 

There are generally two modes:

  1. Pedestrian signal is needed.
  2. Pedestrian signal is not needed. 

Pressing the button once tells the system that when the light changes, it should take the pedestrian into account, and therefore it will increase the green time for the cars (as well as give you a “walk” signal).

The signal does not change any sooner because you pushed the button.

Got that?  It doesn’t hurry up because you pushed it.  It doesn’t switch to crossing mode faster.  It just gives you longer once it does change.  Its failure to switch quickly does not mean it has failed to “hear” you.  You will wait just as long as you would have had you not pushed the button.  But you should still push it because otherwise you will get the normal amount of green time and you won’t get a walk signal, so you probably won’t have enough time to walk.  (No, ped poles are not placebos.  They really do do something.)

So mashing it over and over again, or more than once, is not hurrying things up.  It is a waste of energy.  It is pointless.  It makes you look like an impatient asshole.  And you are not going to get to cross any sooner no matter whether you press it once or forty times.  You just get longer to walk.

Curiously enough, several of my Tumblr friends and I had a reblog-discussion about this same topic back in May. And in that discussion, one reason came up for why some people may press the button multiple times, even if they know it doesn’t do anything. It’s not a good reason, mind you, but there is a psychological aspect to it.

That reason? Pedestrian crossing lights, for the most part, are terrible from a user-interaction perspective.

With most pedestrian crossings, there is absolutely no indication at all that the state has changed— that is, that your button press has even registered— until the next traffic cycle begins. Which, in some cases, can be a minute or more after pressing it. (In the past, I’ve ended up waiting several cycles before discovering that the signal button was, in fact, broken, because there was no way to tell otherwise!) It’s like clicking a link in a web browser, but not getting the little spinny icon that tells you “hey, be patient, I’m loading your page!” until the page has fully finished rendering.

So sometimes, if I push the button and nothing happens for 15 seconds or so, I begin to wonder if my button press actually did register. And so, to be absolutely sure…I end up pushing it again.

There are, of course, exceptions to this terrible user interface. Some of the newer pedestrian signals that I’ve seen have a light near the button that lights up to indicate that the button press has registered but that it’s still not safe to cross. I like these. It’s instant feedback that tells me, “yes, your button press has been recognized”, regardless of how long the traffic cycle happens to be. There’s no need to second-guess yourself about whether it recognized your button press— you know you’ll get a pedestrian signal eventually.

All crossings in the UK have lights that tell you when the button has been pressed.

But you should see how many people go up to it and press it.

WHEN A RED LIGHT AROUND THE BUTTON INDICATES IT HAS CLEARLY BEEN PRESSED.

This whole traffic lights subject is such an interesting study in social psychology.

Source: swankivy

  • 10 months ago > swankivy
  • 24
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

24 Notes/ Hide

  1. squigly-protractor reblogged this from acardcalledhope and added:
    Oh. Well now I feel like an idiot. And also kind of a jerk. Sorry, girl who works for traffic engineers. I’ll go ahead...
  2. acardcalledhope reblogged this from swankivy
  3. nuclearqueen reblogged this from swankivy
  4. boolglunk likes this
  5. lamaminorna reblogged this from swankivy and added:
    Actually stood at a bug junction with a cross-walk button for fifteen minutes until I finally noticed it wasn’t even...
  6. purplewowies likes this
  7. monocotsgonewild likes this
  8. masterofthetardis reblogged this from notunprepared
  9. masterofthetardis likes this
  10. notunprepared reblogged this from swankivy and added:
    Two words: operant conditioning. You get rewarded for pressing the button multiple times.
  11. theotterspeaks reblogged this from childofthefoxes and added:
    Assuming the button is new and well-maintaned, yes. But most such buttons are exposed to weather and infrequently...
  12. xx-rapunzel-xx likes this
  13. lostmymindinseoul likes this
  14. sootonthecarpet said: I don’t think it’ll make it go faster, but a sister of a schoolmate has a habit of always pushing it in a multiple of three, and I’ve walked with her enough that I’ve acquired it. (She’s a little obsessive-compulsive and gets distressed otherwise.)
  15. meaningofnothing likes this
  16. cosmicgourmetvomit likes this
  17. squiditty likes this
  18. flapjackstate reblogged this from codeman38 and added:
    All crossings in the UK have lights that tell you when the button has been pressed. But you should see how many people...
  19. codeman38 reblogged this from swankivy and added:
    Curiously enough, several of my Tumblr friends and I had a reblog-discussion about this same topic back in May. And in...
  20. leolilac said: I always hit it twice because I hate odd numbers and hitting it once bugs me on a subconscious level, not so much because I’m impatient. xD
  21. lilrongal reblogged this from swankivy
  22. swankivy posted this
← Previous • Next →

Portrait/Logo

About

Here you will find my experiences with autism, as well as the anxiety and depression that often come with it.

I want this to be a place of neurodiversity. I'm not an expert, but I welcome questions, thoughts and experiences from others. I want to respect all neurodivergences and that means refusing to reinforce ableism.

I don't use functioning language. Nor do I insult people on the basis of their intelligence, or equate intelligence with worth.

Outside of ableism, I also reblog posts about cissexism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, sizism and any other -isms that are taking place.

As a white cisgender guy I hold a lot of privileges, so I welcome call-outs when I get any of this wrong.

My personal posts tend to be in the actuallyautistic tag.

I can also be found at FY Stimming.

This journal is...
This journal is...
This journal is...
This journal is neurodiversity positive
This journal is body positive


Large Visitor Globe

Pages

  • Accessibility
  • Trigger Warnings
  • Spoons & Self-care
  • #Actuallyautistic: THE BOOK!

Flapjack Elsewhere

  • @Flapjackstate on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask a question
  • Submit Flapjack
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union